• [Code Review] Add F option from dial to app_queue
  jrose - 02/29/12 02:24 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Add F option from dial to app_queue
  jrose - 02/29/12 02:25 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Add F option from dial to app_queue
  jrose - 02/29/12 02:27 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Add F option from dial to app_queue
  rmudgett - 02/29/12 05:46 PM

• [Code Review] Prevent race condition that can cause ast_read to "miss" important frames
  Mark Michelson - 02/29/12 12:49 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Prevent race condition that can cause ast_read to "miss" important frames
  Mark Michelson - 02/29/12 12:53 PM

• [Code Review] Opaquify some ast_channel typedefs, file descriptor arrays, and the _softhangup flag
  Terry Wilson - 02/29/12 12:05 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Opaquify some ast_channel typedefs, file descriptor arrays, and the _softhangup flag
  wedhorn - 02/29/12 11:09 PM

• [Code Review] Fix case-sensitivity for device-specific event subscriptions and CCSS
  opticron - 02/29/12 09:56 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Fix case-sensitivity for device-specific event subscriptions and CCSS
  Mark Michelson - 02/29/12 05:48 PM

• [Code Review] Triggers dialplan actions when specific CONTROL_FRAMES are detected on a channel
  Marco Signorini - 02/29/12 09:05 AM

• [Code Review] Add IPv6 Address Support To Security Events Framework
  elguero - 02/29/12 08:44 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Add IPv6 Address Support To Security Events Framework
  Simon Perreault - 02/29/12 09:09 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Add IPv6 Address Support To Security Events Framework
  elguero - 02/29/12 10:54 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Add IPv6 Address Support To Security Events Framework
  elguero - 02/29/12 10:59 AM

• dahdi 2.6 and oslec compatibility
  d tbsky - 02/29/12 00:31 AM
• Re: dahdi 2.6 and oslec compatibility
  Tzafrir Cohen - 02/29/12 04:42 AM
• Re: dahdi 2.6 and oslec compatibility
  d tbsky - 02/29/12 06:13 PM
• Re: dahdi 2.6 and oslec compatibility
  d tbsky - 02/29/12 07:47 PM

• [Code Review] Create STACK_PEEK to view calling context, extension, and priority
  Tilghman Lesher - 02/28/12 02:38 PM

• [Code Review] copy accountcode to accountcode, not peeraccount in app_dial
  wdoekes - 02/28/12 01:52 PM
• Re: [Code Review] copy accountcode to accountcode, not peeraccount in app_dial
  rmudgett - 02/28/12 05:23 PM

• [Code Review] FastAGI: Add IPv6 support
  Sean Bright - 02/28/12 01:38 PM
• Re: [Code Review] FastAGI: Add IPv6 support
  Simon Perreault - 02/29/12 07:14 AM
• Re: [Code Review] FastAGI: Add IPv6 support
  Mark Michelson - 02/29/12 07:58 AM

• Asterisk 10.2.0-rc3 Now Available
  Asterisk Development Team - 02/28/12 01:05 PM

• Asterisk 1.8.10.0-rc3 Now Available
  Asterisk Development Team - 02/28/12 01:01 PM

• Re: [asterisk-commits] pabelanger: testsuite/asterisk/trunk r3070 - in /asterisk/trunk/tests/channel...
  Matthew Jordan - 02/28/12 10:56 AM
• Re: [asterisk-commits] pabelanger: testsuite/asterisk/trunk r3070 - in /asterisk/trunk/tests/channel...
  Paul Belanger - 02/28/12 02:57 PM
• Re: [asterisk-commits] pabelanger: testsuite/asterisk/trunk r3070 - in /asterisk/trunk/tests/channel...
  Matthew Jordan - 02/28/12 03:20 PM
• Re: [asterisk-commits] pabelanger: testsuite/asterisk/trunk r3070 - in /asterisk/trunk/tests/channel...
  Paul Belanger - 02/28/12 03:34 PM

• Re: [svn-commits] seanbright: trunk r357005 - in /trunk: channels/ include/asterisk/ main/
  Mark Michelson - 02/27/12 09:48 AM

• Matthew Jordan commented on Asterisk Testing - Asterisk 10 Branch - Asterisk CentOS 6 32-Bit 2
  Matthew Jordan - 02/24/12 08:49 PM

• [Code Review] Opaquify ast_channel lists and structs
  Terry Wilson - 02/24/12 07:18 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Opaquify ast_channel lists and structs
  Terry Wilson - 02/27/12 04:48 PM

• Matthew Jordan commented on Asterisk Testing - Asterisk 1.8 Branch - Asterisk 1.8 CentOS 6 64-Bit 5
  Matthew Jordan - 02/24/12 06:51 PM

• Matthew Jordan commented on Asterisk Testing - Asterisk 1.8 Branch 5
  Matthew Jordan - 02/24/12 06:49 PM

• Re: [Code Review] Astobj2 locking enhancement
  Kevin Fleming - 02/24/12 04:20 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: Astobj2 locking enhancement
  rmudgett - 02/24/12 05:17 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Astobj2 locking enhancement
  rmudgett - 02/24/12 06:48 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Astobj2 locking enhancement
  Kevin Fleming - 02/27/12 09:11 AM

• [Code Review] Second attempt at choosing optimal translation paths, specifically when resampling signed linear formats.
  Mark Michelson - 02/24/12 12:14 PM

• Paul Belanger commented on Asterisk - 1.8 - Compile 42
  Paul Belanger - 02/24/12 10:17 AM
• Paul Belanger commented on Asterisk - 1.8 - Compile 42
  Paul Belanger - 02/24/12 10:25 AM

• Re: [Code Review] Audit and reformat IAX2 definitions to match the IANA-registered values.
  Sean Bright - 02/24/12 09:55 AM

• Asterisk 1.8 and SIP Diversion: header
  Pavel Troller - 02/24/12 09:25 AM
• Re: Asterisk 1.8 and SIP Diversion: header
  Jonathan Rose - 02/24/12 10:19 AM
• Re: Asterisk 1.8 and SIP Diversion: header
  Mark Michelson - 02/24/12 10:55 AM
• Re: Asterisk 1.8 and SIP Diversion: header
  Pavel Troller - 02/24/12 11:14 AM

• Matthew Jordan commented on Asterisk - 1.8 - Compile 42
  Matthew Jordan - 02/24/12 09:05 AM
• Matthew Jordan commented on Asterisk - 1.8 - Compile 42
  Matthew Jordan - 02/24/12 09:17 AM

• Paul Belanger commented on Asterisk - 1.8 - Compile - pbuilder-maverick-amd64 42
  Paul Belanger - 02/24/12 08:37 AM

• ast_sockaddr_stringify
  Johann Steinwendtner - 02/24/12 06:01 AM
• Re: ast_sockaddr_stringify
  Matthew Jordan - 02/24/12 07:33 AM
• Re: ast_sockaddr_stringify
  Johann Steinwendtner - 02/24/12 08:36 AM
• Re: ast_sockaddr_stringify
  Simon Perreault - 02/24/12 08:41 AM
• Re: ast_sockaddr_stringify
  Kevin P. Fleming - 02/24/12 08:57 AM

• ConfBrifge question.
  Yaroslav Panych - 02/24/12 04:03 AM
• Re: ConfBrifge question.
  Kevin P. Fleming - 02/24/12 05:40 AM
• Re: ConfBrifge question.
  Yaroslav Panych - 02/24/12 06:53 AM
• Re: ConfBrifge question.
  Matthew Jordan - 02/24/12 07:28 AM
• Re: ConfBrifge question.
  Yaroslav Panych - 02/24/12 03:25 PM

• [Code Review] fix that ./runtests.py -t something doesn't match something_else
  wdoekes - 02/24/12 02:03 AM
• Re: [Code Review] fix that ./runtests.py -t something doesn't match something_else
  Matt Jordan - 02/24/12 07:37 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: fix that ./runtests.py -t something doesn't match something_else
  opticron - 02/24/12 07:49 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: fix that ./runtests.py -t something doesn't match something_else
  Mark Michelson - 02/24/12 08:17 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: fix that ./runtests.py -t something doesn't match something_else
  wdoekes - 02/25/12 02:15 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: fix that ./runtests.py -t something doesn't match something_else
  Matt Jordan - 02/27/12 06:52 AM
• Re: [Code Review] fix that ./runtests.py -t something doesn't match something_else
  opticron - 02/27/12 12:38 PM

• Asterisk 10.1.3 Now Available
  Asterisk Development Team - 02/23/12 05:31 PM

• Asterisk 1.8.9.3 Now Available
  Asterisk Development Team - 02/23/12 05:28 PM

• [Code Review] Opaquify ast_format structs in the ast_channel
  Terry Wilson - 02/23/12 03:27 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Opaquify ast_format structs in the ast_channel
  Mark Michelson - 02/23/12 05:26 PM

• [Code Review] Add option to prevent SIP diversion headers from being sent
  jrose - 02/23/12 09:08 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Add option to prevent SIP diversion headers from being sent
  Matt Jordan - 02/23/12 09:34 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Add option to prevent SIP diversion headers from being sent
  jrose - 02/23/12 09:38 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Add option to prevent SIP diversion headers from being sent
  jrose - 02/23/12 09:39 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Add option to prevent SIP diversion headers from being sent
  Mark Michelson - 02/23/12 10:14 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Add option to prevent SIP diversion headers from being sent
  jrose - 02/23/12 12:14 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Add option to prevent SIP diversion headers from being sent
  Mark Michelson - 02/27/12 08:51 AM

• RTP/SDP for using unknown codecs
  Beñat Urteaga - 02/23/12 04:28 AM
• Re: RTP/SDP for using unknown codecs
  Beñat Urteaga - 02/24/12 06:32 AM
• Re: RTP/SDP for using unknown codecs
  Beñat Urteaga - 02/27/12 03:57 AM
• Re: RTP/SDP for using unknown codecs
  Kevin P. Fleming - 02/27/12 04:42 AM
• Re: RTP/SDP for using unknown codecs
  Beñat Urteaga - 02/27/12 04:51 AM
• Re: RTP/SDP for using unknown codecs
  Steve Underwood - 02/27/12 07:36 AM
• Re: RTP/SDP for using unknown codecs
  Kevin P. Fleming - 02/27/12 08:09 AM

• [Code Review] fix compiling warnings for chan_ooh323
  Paul Belanger - 02/22/12 10:17 PM
• Re: [Code Review] fix compiling warnings for chan_ooh323
  Paul Belanger - 02/22/12 10:19 PM
• Re: [Code Review] fix compiling warnings for chan_ooh323
  Matt Jordan - 02/23/12 08:12 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: fix compiling warnings for chan_ooh323
  Paul Belanger - 02/23/12 08:21 AM
• Re: [Code Review] fix compiling warnings for chan_ooh323
  Paul Belanger - 02/23/12 08:21 AM

• [Code Review] Fix test_utils.c and test_substitution.c for latest opaquification commit
  Terry Wilson - 02/22/12 05:27 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Fix test_utils.c and test_substitution.c for latest opaquification commit
  rmudgett - 02/22/12 06:12 PM

• [Code Review] testing CDR(accountcode) being carried over into local channels
  wdoekes - 02/22/12 03:17 PM
• Re: [Code Review] testing CDR(accountcode) being carried over into local channels
  jrose - 02/23/12 12:19 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: testing CDR(accountcode) being carried over into local channels
  jrose - 02/23/12 12:22 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: testing CDR(accountcode) being carried over into local channels
  wdoekes - 02/23/12 12:57 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: testing CDR(accountcode) being carried over into local channels
  Terry Wilson - 02/23/12 02:12 PM
• Re: [Code Review] testing CDR(accountcode) being carried over into local channels
  wdoekes - 02/28/12 03:09 PM

• (ASTERISK-19336) h exten is not run in the context that calls a AEL macro
  Johan Wilfer - 02/22/12 01:39 PM
• Re: (ASTERISK-19336) h exten is not run in the context that calls a AEL macro
  Mark Murawski - 02/22/12 03:36 PM
• Re: (ASTERISK-19336) h exten is not run in the context that calls a AEL macro
  Johan Wilfer - 02/23/12 04:55 AM
• Re: (ASTERISK-19336) h exten is not run in the context that calls a AEL macro
  Matthew Jordan - 02/23/12 07:28 AM
• Re: (ASTERISK-19336) h exten is not run in the context that calls a AEL macro
  Johan Wilfer - 02/27/12 09:34 AM
• Re: (ASTERISK-19336) h exten is not run in the context that calls a AEL macro
  Tilghman Lesher - 02/28/12 07:00 PM
• Re: (ASTERISK-19336) h exten is not run in the context that calls a AEL macro
  Johan Wilfer - 02/29/12 03:21 AM
• Re: (ASTERISK-19336) h exten is not run in the context that calls a AEL macro
  Tilghman Lesher - 02/29/12 01:47 PM

• [Code Review] Remove chan_usbradio and app_rpt.
  Russell Bryant - 02/22/12 09:02 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Remove chan_usbradio and app_rpt.
  Leif Madsen - 02/22/12 09:07 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Remove chan_usbradio and app_rpt.
  Joshua Colp - 02/23/12 07:50 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Remove chan_usbradio and app_rpt.
  Russell Bryant - 02/28/12 07:23 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Remove chan_usbradio and app_rpt.
  Olle E Johansson - 02/28/12 07:37 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Remove chan_usbradio and app_rpt.
  Leif Madsen - 02/28/12 07:43 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Remove chan_usbradio and app_rpt.
  Leif Madsen - 02/28/12 07:46 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Remove chan_usbradio and app_rpt.
  Tilghman Lesher - 02/28/12 08:55 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Remove chan_usbradio and app_rpt.
  Jason Parker - 02/28/12 08:58 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Remove chan_usbradio and app_rpt.
  Steve Totaro - 02/28/12 01:36 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Remove chan_usbradio and app_rpt.
  Steve Totaro - 02/28/12 02:32 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Remove chan_usbradio and app_rpt.
  Sean Bright - 02/28/12 03:11 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Remove chan_usbradio and app_rpt.
  Steve Totaro - 02/28/12 04:44 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Remove chan_usbradio and app_rpt.
  Steve Totaro - 02/28/12 04:49 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Remove chan_usbradio and app_rpt.
  Russell Bryant - 02/28/12 08:05 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Remove chan_usbradio and app_rpt.
  Micke Andersson - 02/29/12 03:19 AM

• [Code Review] fix compile warnings with app_rpt
  Paul Belanger - 02/22/12 08:43 AM
• Re: [Code Review] fix compile warnings with app_rpt
  Paul Belanger - 02/22/12 08:43 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: fix compile warnings with app_rpt
  Paul Belanger - 02/22/12 09:25 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: fix compile warnings with app_rpt
  Russell Bryant - 02/22/12 09:32 AM
• Re: [Code Review] fix compile warnings with app_rpt
  Matt Jordan - 02/22/12 01:06 PM
• Re: [Code Review] fix compile warnings with app_rpt
  Matt Jordan - 02/22/12 01:09 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: fix compile warnings with app_rpt
  Paul Belanger - 02/22/12 01:40 PM
• Re: [Code Review] fix compile warnings with app_rpt
  Matt Jordan - 02/22/12 01:09 PM

• [Code Review] Add tests for connected line, redirecting, and csss to test new gosub calls
  opticron - 02/21/12 06:50 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Add tests for connected line, redirecting, and csss to test new gosub calls
  Mark Michelson - 02/22/12 11:10 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Add tests for connected line, redirecting, and csss to test new gosub calls
  opticron - 02/24/12 03:36 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Add tests for connected line, redirecting, and csss to test new gosub calls
  Paul Belanger - 02/22/12 11:35 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Add tests for connected line, redirecting, and csss to test new gosub calls
  opticron - 02/24/12 03:36 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Add tests for connected line, redirecting, and csss to test new gosub calls
  Paul Belanger - 02/24/12 07:12 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Add tests for connected line, redirecting, and csss to test new gosub calls
  opticron - 02/24/12 03:36 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Add tests for connected line, redirecting, and csss to test new gosub calls
  Paul Belanger - 02/25/12 10:25 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Add tests for connected line, redirecting, and csss to test new gosub calls
  opticron - 02/26/12 04:02 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Add tests for connected line, redirecting, and csss to test new gosub calls
  opticron - 02/26/12 03:55 PM

• [Code Review] Enable gosub use in connected line, redirecting, and ccss
  opticron - 02/21/12 06:47 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Enable gosub use in connected line, redirecting, and ccss
  Mark Michelson - 02/24/12 07:12 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Enable gosub use in connected line, redirecting, and ccss
  rmudgett - 02/24/12 09:38 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Enable gosub use in connected line, redirecting, and ccss
  opticron - 02/26/12 05:58 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: Enable gosub use in connected line, redirecting, and ccss
  opticron - 02/26/12 06:00 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Enable gosub use in connected line, redirecting, and ccss
  opticron - 02/26/12 05:58 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Enable gosub use in connected line, redirecting, and ccss
  opticron - 02/27/12 07:35 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Enable gosub use in connected line, redirecting, and ccss
  Mark Michelson - 02/27/12 08:27 AM

• [Code Review] Lightweight NAT Support Test
  Joshua Colp - 02/21/12 06:29 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Lightweight NAT Support Test
  Mark Michelson - 02/21/12 11:11 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Lightweight NAT Support Test
  Joshua Colp - 02/22/12 09:49 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Lightweight NAT Support Test
  Paul Belanger - 02/22/12 11:04 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Lightweight NAT Support Test
  Joshua Colp - 02/24/12 06:37 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Lightweight NAT Support Test
  Paul Belanger - 02/24/12 08:09 AM

• [Code Review] Lightweight NAT Support
  Joshua Colp - 02/21/12 06:27 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Lightweight NAT Support
  schmidts - 02/21/12 06:57 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Lightweight NAT Support
  Joshua Colp - 02/21/12 07:02 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Lightweight NAT Support
  Simon Perreault - 02/21/12 07:38 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Lightweight NAT Support
  Joshua Colp - 02/21/12 07:48 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Lightweight NAT Support
  Simon Perreault - 02/21/12 08:13 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Lightweight NAT Support
  Kevin Fleming - 02/21/12 09:15 AM

• possible Bug in Confbridge?
  Gunnar Schaller - 02/21/12 01:47 AM
• Re: possible Bug in Confbridge?
  Matthew Jordan - 02/21/12 06:04 AM
• Re: possible Bug in Confbridge?
  Jakob Hirsch - 02/22/12 01:49 AM
• Re: possible Bug in Confbridge?
  Gunnar Schaller - 02/23/12 01:02 AM

• [Code Review] Convert app_page to use app_confbridge internally
  Joshua Colp - 02/20/12 09:34 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Convert app_page to use app_confbridge internally
  Mark Michelson - 02/20/12 02:14 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Convert app_page to use app_confbridge internally
  Russell Bryant - 02/20/12 02:59 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: Convert app_page to use app_confbridge internally
  Russell Bryant - 02/21/12 07:40 AM

• Re: [Code Review]: PreDial - Ability to run dialplan on callee channel and caller channel right before actual Dial
  schmidts - 02/20/12 08:08 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: PreDial - Ability to run dialplan on callee channel and caller channel right before actual Dial
  kobaz - 02/22/12 03:44 PM

• [Code Review] ast_channel opaquification: most pointers, integer types
  Terry Wilson - 02/18/12 12:45 PM
• Re: [Code Review] ast_channel opaquification: most pointers, integer types
  Mark Michelson - 02/21/12 07:27 AM
• Re: [Code Review] ast_channel opaquification: most pointers, integer types
  opticron - 02/21/12 07:34 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: ast_channel opaquification: most pointers, integer types
  Terry Wilson - 02/21/12 09:17 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: ast_channel opaquification: most pointers, integer types
  opticron - 02/21/12 10:01 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: ast_channel opaquification: most pointers, integer types
  Terry Wilson - 02/21/12 10:27 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: ast_channel opaquification: most pointers, integer types
  opticron - 02/21/12 10:41 AM

• [Code Review] Make ast_unload_resource actually remove the module from the module list when it is unloaded
  Terry Wilson - 02/18/12 12:32 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Make ast_unload_resource actually remove the module from the module list when it is unloaded
  wdoekes - 02/20/12 03:25 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Make ast_unload_resource actually remove the module from the module list when it is unloaded
  Mark Michelson - 02/20/12 01:36 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: Make ast_unload_resource actually remove the module from the module list when it is unloaded
  Terry Wilson - 02/20/12 01:39 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: Make ast_unload_resource actually remove the module from the module list when it is unloaded
  Tilghman Lesher - 02/21/12 02:49 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Make ast_unload_resource actually remove the module from the module list when it is unloaded
  wdoekes - 02/21/12 09:15 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Make ast_unload_resource actually remove the module from the module list when it is unloaded
  Terry Wilson - 02/21/12 09:23 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Make ast_unload_resource actually remove the module from the module list when it is unloaded
  Terry Wilson - 02/22/12 11:13 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Make ast_unload_resource actually remove the module from the module list when it is unloaded
  wdoekes - 02/22/12 12:13 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: Make ast_unload_resource actually remove the module from the module list when it is unloaded
  Terry Wilson - 02/22/12 02:02 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: Make ast_unload_resource actually remove the module from the module list when it is unloaded
  Terry Wilson - 02/22/12 02:04 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: Make ast_unload_resource actually remove the module from the module list when it is unloaded
  wdoekes - 02/22/12 02:22 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: Make ast_unload_resource actually remove the module from the module list when it is unloaded
  Terry Wilson - 02/22/12 03:02 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: Make ast_unload_resource actually remove the module from the module list when it is unloaded
  Terry Wilson - 02/22/12 03:31 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Make ast_unload_resource actually remove the module from the module list when it is unloaded
  Tilghman Lesher - 02/22/12 01:12 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: Make ast_unload_resource actually remove the module from the module list when it is unloaded
  Tilghman Lesher - 02/22/12 01:19 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: Make ast_unload_resource actually remove the module from the module list when it is unloaded
  Terry Wilson - 02/22/12 02:02 PM

• Re: [svn-commits] seanbright: branch 1.8 r355746 - /branches/1.8/channels/chan_iax2.c
  Richard Mudgett - 02/17/12 01:48 PM
• Re: [svn-commits] seanbright: branch 1.8 r355746 - /branches/1.8/channels/chan_iax2.c
  Sean Bright - 02/17/12 02:50 PM
• Re: [svn-commits] seanbright: branch 1.8 r355746 - /branches/1.8/channels/chan_iax2.c
  Tilghman Lesher - 02/17/12 02:50 PM

• Re: [svn-commits] pabelanger: branch 1.8 r355700 - in /branches/1.8/addons: ./ ooh323c/src/
  Richard Mudgett - 02/16/12 05:10 PM
• Re: [svn-commits] pabelanger: branch 1.8 r355700 - in /branches/1.8/addons: ./ ooh323c/src/
  Paul Belanger - 02/16/12 05:21 PM

• [Code Review] regression test for ASTERISK-19358 part 2 (send ACK to 200-Contact, not 1xx-Contact)
  wdoekes - 02/16/12 09:48 AM
• Re: [Code Review] regression test for ASTERISK-19358 part 2 (send ACK to 200-Contact, not 1xx-Contact)
  Matt Jordan - 02/16/12 11:06 AM
• Re: [Code Review] regression test for ASTERISK-19358 part 2 (send ACK to 200-Contact, not 1xx-Contact)
  Paul Belanger - 02/16/12 11:32 AM

• [Code Review] Fixing the regression from wrong set route information on provisional sip responses
  schmidts - 02/16/12 07:13 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Fixing the regression from wrong set route information on provisional sip responses
  schmidts - 02/16/12 07:21 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Fixing the regression from wrong set route information on provisional sip responses
  Mark Michelson - 02/16/12 09:35 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Fixing the regression from wrong set route information on provisional sip responses
  kwemheuer - 02/17/12 06:27 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Fixing the regression from wrong set route information on provisional sip responses
  wdoekes - 02/17/12 07:28 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Fixing the regression from wrong set route information on provisional sip responses
  kwemheuer - 02/17/12 08:11 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Fixing the regression from wrong set route information on provisional sip responses
  Mark Michelson - 02/17/12 09:30 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Fixing the regression from wrong set route information on provisional sip responses
  schmidts - 02/16/12 02:59 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Fixing the regression from wrong set route information on provisional sip responses
  Mark Michelson - 02/17/12 09:30 AM

• [Code Review] sync chan_dahdi->p->outgoing with sig_analog->p-outgoing
  Alec Davis - 02/16/12 02:48 AM
• Re: [Code Review] sync chan_dahdi->p->outgoing with sig_analog->p-outgoing
  Alec Davis - 02/16/12 02:48 AM
• Re: [Code Review] sync chan_dahdi->p->outgoing with sig_analog->p-outgoing
  Alec Davis - 02/16/12 03:20 AM
• Re: [Code Review] sync chan_dahdi->p->outgoing with sig_analog->p-outgoing
  rmudgett - 02/16/12 10:06 AM
• Re: [Code Review] sync chan_dahdi->p->outgoing with sig_analog->p-outgoing
  Alec Davis - 02/17/12 01:07 AM
• Re: [Code Review] sync chan_dahdi->p->outgoing with sig_XXX->p-outgoing
  Alec Davis - 02/17/12 01:54 AM
• Re: [Code Review] sync chan_dahdi->p->outgoing with sig_XXX->p-outgoing
  rmudgett - 02/17/12 08:54 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: sync chan_dahdi->p->outgoing with sig_XXX->p-outgoing
  Alec Davis - 02/17/12 12:31 PM
• Re: [Code Review] sync chan_dahdi->p->outgoing with sig_XXX->p-outgoing
  Alec Davis - 02/17/12 01:23 PM
• Re: [Code Review] sync chan_dahdi->p->outgoing with sig_XXX->p-outgoing
  rmudgett - 02/17/12 02:41 PM

• [Code Review] Add ability to clone ao2 containers.
  rmudgett - 02/15/12 07:05 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Add ability to clone ao2 containers.
  Russell Bryant - 02/15/12 08:14 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: Add ability to clone ao2 containers.
  Matt Jordan - 02/16/12 11:50 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Add ability to clone ao2 containers.
  Kevin Fleming - 02/24/12 04:03 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Add ability to clone ao2 containers.
  rmudgett - 02/16/12 01:39 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Add ability to clone ao2 containers.
  Mark Michelson - 02/16/12 09:17 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Add ability to clone ao2 containers.
  rmudgett - 02/16/12 09:28 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Add ability to clone ao2 containers.
  Mark Michelson - 02/16/12 09:48 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Add ability to clone ao2 containers.
  rmudgett - 02/16/12 10:32 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Add ability to clone ao2 containers.
  Matt Jordan - 02/16/12 11:53 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Add ability to clone ao2 containers.
  rmudgett - 02/24/12 03:51 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Add ability to clone ao2 containers.
  Kevin Fleming - 02/24/12 04:03 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: Add ability to clone ao2 containers.
  rmudgett - 02/24/12 04:18 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: Add ability to clone ao2 containers.
  Kevin Fleming - 02/24/12 04:25 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Add ability to clone ao2 containers.
  rmudgett - 02/24/12 06:11 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Add ability to clone ao2 containers.
  Kevin Fleming - 02/27/12 09:13 AM

• [Code Review] No valid transports available, falling back to 'udp'
  wdoekes - 02/15/12 01:33 PM
• Re: [Code Review] No valid transports available, falling back to 'udp'
  wdoekes - 02/15/12 01:35 PM
• Re: [Code Review] No valid transports available, falling back to 'udp'
  wdoekes - 02/15/12 01:46 PM
• Re: [Code Review] No valid transports available, falling back to 'udp'
  sean darcy - 02/15/12 06:09 PM
• Re: [Code Review] No valid transports available, falling back to 'udp'
  Kevin P. Fleming - 02/16/12 09:43 AM
• Re: [Code Review] No valid transports available, falling back to 'udp'
  Kevin Fleming - 02/16/12 09:43 AM
• Re: [Code Review] No valid transports available, falling back to 'udp'
  Joshua Colp - 02/23/12 07:02 AM

• Re: [Code Review] Bring the (missing) changes from Mantis ID 13495 in trunk.
  KNK - 02/15/12 03:19 AM

• [Code Review] avoid many cppcheck (#2)
  junky - 02/14/12 08:15 PM
• Re: [Code Review] avoid many cppcheck (#2)
  junky - 02/14/12 08:15 PM
• Re: [Code Review] avoid many cppcheck (#2)
  wdoekes - 02/28/12 02:35 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: avoid many cppcheck (#2)
  junky - 02/29/12 11:22 PM
• Re: [Code Review] avoid many cppcheck (#2)
  junky - 02/29/12 11:22 PM

• [Code Review] Add ability to reload SRTP policies
  Matt Jordan - 02/14/12 04:25 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Add ability to reload SRTP policies
  Matt Jordan - 02/16/12 10:30 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Add ability to reload SRTP policies
  Matt Jordan - 02/16/12 10:39 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Add ability to reload SRTP policies
  Mark Michelson - 02/16/12 03:51 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: Add ability to reload SRTP policies
  Matt Jordan - 02/16/12 04:07 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Add ability to reload SRTP policies
  Matt Jordan - 02/23/12 08:33 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Add ability to reload SRTP policies
  Mark Michelson - 02/23/12 10:44 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Add ability to reload SRTP policies
  Bernard Merindol(F) - 02/25/12 07:58 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Add ability to reload SRTP policies
  Matthew Jordan - 02/25/12 10:11 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Add ability to reload SRTP policies
  F - 02/27/12 02:55 AM

• Re: [asterisk-commits] tilghman: trunk r355413 - in /trunk: ./ addons/ codecs/ configs/ funcs/ inclu...
  Jamuel Starkey - 02/14/12 01:43 PM
• Re: [asterisk-commits] tilghman: trunk r355413 - in /trunk: ./ addons/ codecs/ configs/ funcs/ inclu...
  Tilghman Lesher - 02/14/12 03:00 PM

• Re: [svn-commits] tilghman: trunk r355413 - in /trunk: ./ addons/ codecs/ configs/ funcs/ inclu...
  Olle E. Johansson - 02/14/12 01:31 PM
• Re: [svn-commits] tilghman: trunk r355413 - in /trunk: ./ addons/ codecs/ configs/ funcs/ inclu...
  Tilghman Lesher - 02/14/12 01:37 PM

• [Code Review] Fix unlocking typo in cel_sqlite3_custom module reload
  a_villacis - 02/14/12 10:20 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Fix unlocking typo in cel_sqlite3_custom module reload
  rmudgett - 02/14/12 10:34 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Fix unlocking typo in cel_sqlite3_custom module reload
  rmudgett - 02/14/12 10:35 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Fix unlocking typo in cel_sqlite3_custom module reload
  a_villacis - 02/14/12 10:44 AM

• [Code Review] Fix memory leak, possible crash in sip show peers
  Matt Jordan - 02/14/12 05:52 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Fix memory leak, possible crash in sip show peers
  Mark Michelson - 02/14/12 09:21 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Fix memory leak, possible crash in sip show peers
  Matt Jordan - 02/14/12 09:36 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Fix memory leak, possible crash in sip show peers
  Kevin Fleming - 02/16/12 07:03 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Fix memory leak, possible crash in sip show peers
  Matt Jordan - 02/16/12 07:03 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Fix memory leak, possible crash in sip show peers
  Matt Jordan - 02/14/12 11:55 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Fix memory leak, possible crash in sip show peers
  Mark Michelson - 02/14/12 01:04 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: Fix memory leak, possible crash in sip show peers
  Matt Jordan - 02/14/12 03:38 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Fix memory leak, possible crash in sip show peers
  Kevin Fleming - 02/14/12 11:59 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Fix memory leak, possible crash in sip show peers
  Kevin Fleming - 02/14/12 11:59 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Fix memory leak, possible crash in sip show peers
  Matt Jordan - 02/14/12 12:39 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Fix memory leak, possible crash in sip show peers
  Mark Michelson - 02/14/12 01:04 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: Fix memory leak, possible crash in sip show peers
  Matt Jordan - 02/14/12 03:38 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Fix memory leak, possible crash in sip show peers
  Matt Jordan - 02/16/12 07:03 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Fix memory leak, possible crash in sip show peers
  rmudgett - 02/14/12 03:52 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Fix memory leak, possible crash in sip show peers
  Matt Jordan - 02/16/12 07:03 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Fix memory leak, possible crash in sip show peers
  rmudgett - 02/14/12 05:40 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: Fix memory leak, possible crash in sip show peers
  rmudgett - 02/14/12 05:59 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: Fix memory leak, possible crash in sip show peers
  Matt Jordan - 02/14/12 07:48 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Fix memory leak, possible crash in sip show peers
  Kevin Fleming - 02/15/12 06:34 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Fix memory leak, possible crash in sip show peers
  Matt Jordan - 02/19/12 11:46 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Fix memory leak, possible crash in sip show peers
  Matt Jordan - 02/19/12 11:45 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Fix memory leak, possible crash in sip show peers
  rmudgett - 02/16/12 01:52 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: Fix memory leak, possible crash in sip show peers
  Matt Jordan - 02/16/12 01:55 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Fix memory leak, possible crash in sip show peers
  Matt Jordan - 02/19/12 11:46 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Fix memory leak, possible crash in sip show peers
  rmudgett - 02/16/12 03:09 PM

• Re: [Code Review] Changes from Mantis ID 13495 in trunk.
  KNK - 02/14/12 03:55 AM

• Re: [Code Review]: Bring the (missing) changes from Mantis ID 13495 in trunk.
  KNK - 02/14/12 03:52 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Bring the (missing) changes from Mantis ID 13495 in trunk.
  rmudgett - 02/14/12 08:55 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Bring the (missing) changes from Mantis ID 13495 in trunk.
  KNK - 02/15/12 03:20 AM

• [Code Review] chan_dahdi: Add dialtonedetect option
  Jeremy Pepper - 02/13/12 12:37 PM
• Re: [Code Review] chan_dahdi: Add dialtonedetect option
  rmudgett - 02/13/12 01:56 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: chan_dahdi: Add dialtonedetect option
  Jeremy Pepper - 02/13/12 04:20 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: chan_dahdi: Add dialtonedetect option
  rmudgett - 02/13/12 04:32 PM
• Re: [Code Review] chan_dahdi: Add dialtonedetect option
  Jeremy Pepper - 02/13/12 05:27 PM
• Re: [Code Review] chan_dahdi: Add dialtonedetect option
  rmudgett - 02/13/12 05:53 PM
• Re: [Code Review] chan_dahdi: Add dialtonedetect option
  Jeremy Pepper - 02/13/12 06:17 PM
• Re: [Code Review] chan_dahdi: Add dialtonedetect option
  rmudgett - 02/13/12 06:48 PM
• Re: [Code Review] chan_dahdi: Add dialtonedetect option
  Alec Davis - 02/14/12 01:44 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: chan_dahdi: Add dialtonedetect option
  Jeremy Pepper - 02/14/12 08:26 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: chan_dahdi: Add dialtonedetect option
  Alec Davis - 02/16/12 02:50 AM
• Re: [Code Review] chan_dahdi: Add dialtonedetect option
  Jeremy Pepper - 02/14/12 08:43 AM
• Re: [Code Review] chan_dahdi: Add dialtonedetect option
  Alec Davis - 02/14/12 03:55 PM

• New agents does not get noted for waiting callers in the queue
  Kristijan Vrban - 02/13/12 03:59 AM
• Re: New agents does not get noted for waiting callers in the queue
  Kevin P. Fleming - 02/13/12 08:27 AM
• Re: New agents does not get noted for waiting callers in the queue
  Kristijan Vrban - 02/13/12 09:34 AM
• Re: New agents does not get noted for waiting callers in the queue
  Kevin P. Fleming - 02/13/12 09:46 AM
• Re: New agents does not get noted for waiting callers in the queue
  Kristijan Vrban - 02/14/12 01:22 AM
• Re: New agents does not get noted for waiting callers in the queue
  Kristijan Vrban - 02/15/12 08:12 AM

• [Code Review] Add AGIEXITONHANGUP variable.
  Russell Bryant - 02/12/12 12:07 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Add AGIEXITONHANGUP variable.
  Mark Michelson - 02/13/12 10:20 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Add AGIEXITONHANGUP variable.
  Russell Bryant - 02/13/12 05:42 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Add AGIEXITONHANGUP variable.
  rmudgett - 02/13/12 10:43 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Add AGIEXITONHANGUP variable.
  Russell Bryant - 02/13/12 05:43 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Add AGIEXITONHANGUP variable.
  rmudgett - 02/13/12 02:10 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: Add AGIEXITONHANGUP variable.
  Russell Bryant - 02/13/12 05:35 PM

• [Code Review] Opaquify const char * and charin the ast_channel
  Terry Wilson - 02/11/12 01:24 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Opaquify const char * and char[] in the ast_channel
  Mark Michelson - 02/13/12 10:18 AM

• Non-universalized log messages render security tools useless in Asterisk SVN-branch-1.8-r354348 or maybe other versions as well !!!
  Bruce B - 02/11/12 11:24 AM
• Re: Non-universalized log messages render security tools useless in Asterisk SVN-branch-1.8-r354348 or maybe other versions as well !!!
  Pavel Troller - 02/11/12 11:48 AM
• Re: Non-universalized log messages render security tools useless in Asterisk SVN-branch-1.8-r354348 or maybe other versions as well !!!
  Bruce B - 02/11/12 12:27 PM
• Re: Non-universalized log messages render security tools useless in Asterisk SVN-branch-1.8-r354348 or maybe other versions as well !!!
  Pavel Troller - 02/11/12 01:58 PM
• Re: Non-universalized log messages render security tools useless in Asterisk SVN-branch-1.8-r354348 or maybe other versions as well !!!
  Bruce B - 02/12/12 08:19 AM
• Re: Non-universalized log messages render security tools useless in Asterisk SVN-branch-1.8-r354348 or maybe other versions as well !!!
  Bruce B - 02/12/12 04:06 PM
• Re: Non-universalized log messages render security tools useless in Asterisk SVN-branch-1.8-r354348 or maybe other versions as well !!!
  Michael L. Young - 02/13/12 05:30 AM
• Re: Non-universalized log messages render security tools useless in Asterisk SVN-branch-1.8-r354348 or maybe other versions as well !!!
  Bruce B - 02/13/12 07:50 AM
• Re: Non-universalized log messages render security tools useless in Asterisk SVN-branch-1.8-r354348 or maybe other versions as well !!!
  Matthew Jordan - 02/13/12 08:05 AM
• Re: Non-universalized log messages render security tools useless in Asterisk SVN-branch-1.8-r354348 or maybe other versions as well !!!
  Matthew Jordan - 02/13/12 08:07 AM
• Re: Non-universalized log messages render security tools useless in Asterisk SVN-branch-1.8-r354348 or maybe other versions as well !!!
  Bruce B - 02/13/12 08:36 AM
• Re: Non-universalized log messages render security tools useless in Asterisk SVN-branch-1.8-r354348 or maybe other versions as well !!!
  Matthew Jordan - 02/13/12 08:48 AM
• Re: Non-universalized log messages render security tools useless in Asterisk SVN-branch-1.8-r354348 or maybe other versions as well !!!
  Bruce B - 02/13/12 08:58 AM
• Re: Non-universalized log messages render security tools useless in Asterisk SVN-branch-1.8-r354348 or maybe other versions as well !!!
  Michael L. Young - 02/13/12 09:30 AM
• Re: Non-universalized log messages render security tools useless in Asterisk SVN-branch-1.8-r354348 or maybe other versions as well !!!
  Bruce B - 02/13/12 09:45 AM
• Re: Non-universalized log messages render security tools useless in Asterisk SVN-branch-1.8-r354348 or maybe other versions as well !!!
  Paul Belanger - 02/11/12 01:38 PM
• Re: Non-universalized log messages render security tools useless in Asterisk SVN-branch-1.8-r354348 or maybe other versions as well !!!
  Bruce B - 02/12/12 08:37 AM

• [Code Review] Convert two classes of strncpy usage to ast_copy_string
  Terry Wilson - 02/10/12 07:31 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Convert two classes of strncpy usage to ast_copy_string
  Tilghman Lesher - 02/11/12 00:28 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Convert two classes of strncpy usage to ast_copy_string
  Terry Wilson - 02/11/12 08:39 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Convert two classes of strncpy usage to ast_copy_string
  opticron - 02/28/12 06:41 AM

• [Code Review] Fix reconnecting to pgsql database after connection loss.
  rmudgett - 02/10/12 05:06 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Fix reconnecting to pgsql database after connection loss.
  Tilghman Lesher - 02/11/12 00:04 AM

• Asterisk 10.2.0-rc2 Now Available
  Asterisk Development Team - 02/10/12 02:58 PM

• Asterisk 1.8.10.0-rc2 Now Available
  Asterisk Development Team - 02/10/12 02:54 PM

• Is externalivr really ready for "real" usage?
  Steve Murphy - 02/09/12 11:14 PM
• Re: Is externalivr really ready for "real" usage?
  Paul Belanger - 02/10/12 07:44 AM
• Re: Is externalivr really ready for "real" usage?
  Chris Tooley - 02/10/12 08:16 AM
• Re: Is externalivr really ready for "real" usage?
  Steve Murphy - 02/10/12 06:20 PM
• Re: Is externalivr really ready for "real" usage?
  Chris Tooley - 02/10/12 06:37 PM
• Re: Is externalivr really ready for "real" usage?
  Steve Murphy - 02/13/12 07:29 AM
• Re: Is externalivr really ready for "real" usage?
  Chris Tooley - 02/13/12 09:05 AM
• Re: Is externalivr really ready for "real" usage?
  David Ruggles - 02/16/12 07:48 AM

• [Code Review] Fix SIP blind transfer playing parking slot to caller.
  rmudgett - 02/09/12 05:00 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Fix SIP blind transfer playing parking slot to caller.
  rmudgett - 02/09/12 06:11 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Fix SIP blind transfer playing parking slot to caller.
  Mark Michelson - 02/20/12 09:15 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Fix SIP blind transfer playing parking slot to caller.
  Joshua Colp - 02/23/12 07:17 AM

• Asterisk 10.1.2 Now Available
  Asterisk Development Team - 02/09/12 02:48 PM

• Re: [Code Review] Remove some dead code found in _sip_show_peers()
  Mark Michelson - 02/09/12 02:44 PM

• Asterisk 1.8.9.2 Now Available
  Asterisk Development Team - 02/09/12 02:43 PM

• app_voicemail fails to comp with imap storage
  Taylor, Jonn - 02/09/12 01:25 PM

• [Code Review] Fix parsing of SIP headers where compact and non-compact headers are mixed
  opticron - 02/09/12 12:22 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Fix parsing of SIP headers where compact and non-compact headers are mixed
  Mark Michelson - 02/09/12 01:23 PM

• [Code Review] Add tests to check parsing of compact and non-compact headers
  opticron - 02/09/12 12:20 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Add tests to check parsing of compact and non-compact headers
  Mark Michelson - 02/09/12 01:17 PM

• [Code Review] Make the config parser remove escaping backslashes
  opticron - 02/09/12 12:13 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Make the config parser remove escaping backslashes
  Mark Michelson - 02/09/12 12:39 PM

• [Code Review] Add test for LEN function which includes testing for config escapes
  opticron - 02/09/12 12:13 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Add test for LEN function which includes testing for config escapes
  Mark Michelson - 02/09/12 12:45 PM

• improvement of canreinvite behavior
  Pietro Bertera - 02/09/12 03:46 AM
• Re: improvement of directmedia behavior
  Kevin P. Fleming - 02/09/12 06:04 AM
• Re: improvement of directmedia behavior
  Pietro Bertera - 02/09/12 06:16 AM

• Re: [Code Review] Add a SIP nat=auto setting
  Terry Wilson - 02/08/12 10:35 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Add a SIP nat=auto setting
  Kevin Fleming - 02/09/12 08:37 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Add a SIP nat=auto setting
  Terry Wilson - 02/09/12 11:00 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Add a SIP nat=auto setting
  Terry Wilson - 02/09/12 11:05 AM

• [Code Review] Add SIP INFO DTMF test to the Asterisk Test Suite
  Matt Jordan - 02/08/12 04:48 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Add SIP INFO DTMF test to the Asterisk Test Suite
  Matt Jordan - 02/08/12 04:52 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Add SIP INFO DTMF test to the Asterisk Test Suite
  Matt Jordan - 02/08/12 04:52 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Add SIP INFO DTMF test to the Asterisk Test Suite
  Matt Jordan - 02/09/12 08:12 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Add SIP INFO DTMF test to the Asterisk Test Suite
  Matt Jordan - 02/09/12 08:17 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Add SIP INFO DTMF test to the Asterisk Test Suite
  Paul Belanger - 02/09/12 08:22 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Add SIP INFO DTMF test to the Asterisk Test Suite
  Matt Jordan - 02/09/12 08:37 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Add SIP INFO DTMF test to the Asterisk Test Suite
  Paul Belanger - 02/09/12 08:44 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Add SIP INFO DTMF test to the Asterisk Test Suite
  Matt Jordan - 02/09/12 08:54 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Add SIP INFO DTMF test to the Asterisk Test Suite
  Paul Belanger - 02/09/12 08:42 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Add SIP INFO DTMF test to the Asterisk Test Suite
  Mark Michelson - 02/09/12 12:22 PM

• [Code Review] SIP INFO DTMF non-numeric codes treated as '1'
  Matt Jordan - 02/08/12 04:46 PM
• Re: [Code Review] SIP INFO DTMF non-numeric codes treated as '1'
  rmudgett - 02/08/12 08:47 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: SIP INFO DTMF non-numeric codes treated as '1'
  rmudgett - 02/08/12 08:56 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: SIP INFO DTMF non-numeric codes treated as '1'
  Matt Jordan - 02/09/12 07:58 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: SIP INFO DTMF non-numeric codes treated as '1'
  Joshua Colp - 02/10/12 07:16 AM
• Re: [Code Review] SIP INFO DTMF non-numeric codes treated as '1'
  Matt Jordan - 02/09/12 08:05 AM
• Re: [Code Review] SIP INFO DTMF non-numeric codes treated as '1'
  Matt Jordan - 02/09/12 09:00 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: SIP INFO DTMF non-numeric codes treated as '1'
  Joshua Colp - 02/10/12 07:15 AM
• Re: [Code Review] SIP INFO DTMF non-numeric codes treated as '1'
  Joshua Colp - 02/09/12 09:15 AM
• Re: [Code Review] SIP INFO DTMF non-numeric codes treated as '1'
  rmudgett - 02/09/12 09:46 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: SIP INFO DTMF non-numeric codes treated as '1'
  Matt Jordan - 02/09/12 10:04 AM

• Re: [Code Review] iLBC codec can be added to asterisk again as it is available under a new license now
  Paul Belanger - 02/08/12 04:41 PM

• (last call for comments) Proposed changes to Asterisk release and support cycles
  Kevin P. Fleming - 02/08/12 01:50 PM

• Could pri-123 be reopened as this is still an issue?
  Steve Hanselman - 02/08/12 08:20 AM
• Re: Could pri-123 be reopened as this is still an issue?
  Kevin P. Fleming - 02/08/12 09:27 AM
• Re: Could pri-123 be reopened as this is still an issue?
  Richard Mudgett - 02/08/12 09:45 AM

• Re: [Code Review]: Add a SIP nat=auto setting
  Kevin P. Fleming - 02/08/12 07:43 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Add a SIP nat=auto setting
  SaÃl Ibarra Corretgà - 02/08/12 07:57 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Add a SIP nat=auto setting
  Kevin P. Fleming - 02/08/12 08:05 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Add a SIP nat=auto setting
  Terry Wilson - 02/08/12 09:45 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Add a SIP nat=auto setting
  Terry Wilson - 02/08/12 09:53 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Add a SIP nat=auto setting
  SaÃl Ibarra Corretgà - 02/08/12 10:44 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Add a SIP nat=auto setting
  Terry Wilson - 02/08/12 11:16 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Add a SIP nat=auto setting
  SaÃl Ibarra Corretgà - 02/08/12 10:47 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Add a SIP nat=auto setting
  Kevin P. Fleming - 02/08/12 11:53 AM

• Re: [asterisk-commits] kmoore: trunk r354165 - in /trunk/channels: chan_dahdi.c sig_pri.h
  Kevin P. Fleming - 02/08/12 07:40 AM

• incorrect handling of UPDATE response with canreinvite=update
  Pietro Bertera - 02/08/12 07:38 AM
• Re: incorrect handling of UPDATE response with canreinvite=update
  Kevin P. Fleming - 02/08/12 07:50 AM
• Re: incorrect handling of UPDATE response with canreinvite=update
  Pietro Bertera - 02/08/12 10:14 AM

• [Code Review] Send udptl packets directly between both call legs without extrac them
  vrban - 02/08/12 05:39 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Send udptl packets directly between both call legs without extrac them
  vrban - 02/08/12 08:43 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Send udptl packets directly between both call legs without extrac them
  Mark Michelson - 02/08/12 11:06 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Send udptl packets directly between both call legs without extrac them
  Joshua Colp - 02/09/12 09:36 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Send udptl packets directly between both call legs without extrac them
  vrban - 02/10/12 08:44 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Send udptl packets directly between both call legs without extrac them
  Joshua Colp - 02/16/12 09:32 AM

• Re: t.38 passthrough filters redudant packages ?
  Kristijan Vrban - 02/08/12 03:37 AM

• [Code Review] If a CDR variable is set during a bridged call, make sure the values get copied over to the bridge CDR
  Terry Wilson - 02/07/12 05:35 PM
• Re: [Code Review] If a CDR variable is set during a bridged call, make sure the values get copied over to the bridge CDR
  Tilghman Lesher - 02/08/12 01:34 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: If a CDR variable is set during a bridged call, make sure the values get copied over to the bridge CDR
  Terry Wilson - 02/09/12 10:17 AM
• Re: [Code Review] If a CDR variable is set during a bridged call, make sure the values get copied over to the bridge CDR
  Mark Michelson - 02/09/12 12:13 PM

• [Code Review] Document that CDRs cannot be modified after the bridge between two channels is broken
  Terry Wilson - 02/07/12 03:33 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Document that CDRs cannot be modified after the bridge between two channels is broken
  Joshua Colp - 02/09/12 09:36 AM

• [Code Review] Resolve odbc segfaults by adding shared locks around usage of odbc handle in res_odbc
  jrose - 02/07/12 01:38 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Resolve odbc segfaults by adding shared locks around usage of odbc handle in res_odbc
  Tilghman Lesher - 02/07/12 02:32 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: Resolve odbc segfaults by adding shared locks around usage of odbc handle in res_odbc
  jrose - 02/07/12 03:16 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Resolve odbc segfaults by adding shared locks around usage of odbc handle in res_odbc
  wdoekes - 02/08/12 01:34 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Resolve odbc segfaults by adding shared locks around usage of odbc handle in res_odbc
  Tilghman Lesher - 02/08/12 12:49 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: Resolve odbc segfaults by adding shared locks around usage of odbc handle in res_odbc
  wdoekes - 02/08/12 01:16 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: Resolve odbc segfaults by adding shared locks around usage of odbc handle in res_odbc
  Tilghman Lesher - 02/08/12 01:59 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: Resolve odbc segfaults by adding shared locks around usage of odbc handle in res_odbc
  jrose - 02/08/12 02:41 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Resolve odbc segfaults by adding shared locks around usage of odbc handle in res_odbc
  jrose - 02/08/12 07:48 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Resolve odbc segfaults by adding shared locks around usage of odbc handle in res_odbc
  rmudgett - 02/14/12 10:18 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Resolve odbc segfaults by adding shared locks around usage of odbc handle in res_odbc
  Tilghman Lesher - 02/14/12 12:25 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: Resolve odbc segfaults by adding shared locks around usage of odbc handle in res_odbc
  jrose - 02/24/12 01:03 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Resolve odbc segfaults by adding shared locks around usage of odbc handle in res_odbc
  jrose - 02/24/12 01:02 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Resolve odbc segfaults by adding shared locks around usage of odbc handle in res_odbc
  jrose - 02/24/12 01:03 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Resolve odbc segfaults by adding shared locks around usage of odbc handle in res_odbc
  jrose - 02/24/12 01:10 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Resolve odbc segfaults by adding shared locks around usage of odbc handle in res_odbc
  jrose - 02/24/12 01:10 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Resolve odbc segfaults by adding shared locks around usage of odbc handle in res_odbc
  jrose - 02/24/12 01:12 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Resolve odbc segfaults by adding shared locks around usage of odbc handle in res_odbc
  rmudgett - 02/24/12 01:30 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Resolve odbc segfaults by adding shared locks around usage of odbc handle in res_odbc
  jrose - 02/24/12 02:42 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Resolve odbc segfaults by adding shared locks around usage of odbc handle in res_odbc
  rmudgett - 02/24/12 03:12 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: Resolve odbc segfaults by adding shared locks around usage of odbc handle in res_odbc
  jrose - 02/24/12 03:19 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Resolve odbc segfaults by adding shared locks around usage of odbc handle in res_odbc
  jrose - 02/24/12 03:45 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Resolve odbc segfaults by adding shared locks around usage of odbc handle in res_odbc
  Tilghman Lesher - 02/24/12 04:00 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Resolve odbc segfaults by adding shared locks around usage of odbc handle in res_odbc
  rmudgett - 02/24/12 04:03 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Resolve odbc segfaults by adding shared locks around usage of odbc handle in res_odbc
  wdoekes - 02/27/12 01:10 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Resolve odbc segfaults by adding shared locks around usage of odbc handle in res_odbc
  jrose - 02/27/12 08:09 AM
• Re: [Code Review]: Resolve odbc segfaults by adding shared locks around usage of odbc handle in res_odbc
  Tilghman Lesher - 02/27/12 12:32 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: Resolve odbc segfaults by adding shared locks around usage of odbc handle in res_odbc
  jrose - 02/27/12 12:44 PM

• Re: [Code Review]: adding shared locks around usage of odbc handle in res_odbc
  jrose - 02/07/12 01:38 PM

• Asterisk 1.8.9.1 Now Available
  Asterisk Development Team - 02/07/12 01:29 PM

• Asterisk 10.1.1 Now Available
  Asterisk Development Team - 02/07/12 01:29 PM

• [Code Review] Make callbackextension work for realtime and also match on callbackextension when multiple peers with the same host have differing callbackextensions
  Terry Wilson - 02/07/12 01:13 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Make callbackextension work for realtime and also match on callbackextension when multiple peers with the same host have differing callbackextensions
  Mark Michelson - 02/08/12 11:26 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Make callbackextension work for realtime and also match on callbackextension when multiple peers with the same host have differing callbackextensions
  wdoekes - 02/08/12 02:14 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: Make callbackextension work for realtime and also match on callbackextension when multiple peers with the same host have differing callbackextensions
  wdoekes - 02/08/12 02:20 PM

• Re: Need help getting Resfax F option up to current 1.8 trunk
  Bryant Zimmerman - 02/07/12 12:39 PM

• Re: kindly asking for a bit of testing for a DTMF issue
  Alex Hermann - 02/07/12 07:41 AM
• Re: kindly asking for a bit of testing for a DTMF issue
  Walter Doekes - 02/07/12 08:38 AM
• Re: kindly asking for a bit of testing for a DTMF issue
  Alex Hermann - 02/07/12 09:35 AM

• [Code Review] Don't take computational cost into account when creating multistep translations
  Mark Michelson - 02/06/12 03:33 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Don't take computational cost into account when creating multistep translations
  rmudgett - 02/06/12 05:27 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: Don't take computational cost into account when creating multistep translations
  jrose - 02/07/12 08:09 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Don't take computational cost into account when creating multistep translations
  Kevin Fleming - 02/08/12 01:42 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Don't take computational cost into account when creating multistep translations
  Joshua Colp - 02/09/12 09:26 AM

• Re: [Code Review] avoid cppcheck warnings
  wdoekes - 02/06/12 01:09 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: avoid cppcheck warnings
  Terry Wilson - 02/07/12 03:04 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: avoid cppcheck warnings
  junky - 02/07/12 06:32 PM
• Re: [Code Review] avoid cppcheck warnings
  junky - 02/07/12 06:34 PM

• HylaFax Protocol Implementation
  Wolfgang Pichler - 02/06/12 01:10 AM
• Re: HylaFax Protocol Implementation
  Steve Underwood - 02/06/12 07:48 AM
• Re: HylaFax Protocol Implementation
  Wolfgang Pichler - 02/07/12 00:47 AM
• Re: HylaFax Protocol Implementation
  Lee Howard - 02/07/12 06:54 AM

• Re: [Code Review] Update to chan_unistim functionality
  IgorG - 02/04/12 04:01 AM
• Re: [Code Review] Update to chan_unistim functionality
  IgorG - 02/28/12 10:03 AM

• [Code Review] Resource leak in SIP/TCP
  rmudgett - 02/03/12 04:05 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Resource leak in SIP/TCP
  Mark Michelson - 02/09/12 02:43 PM
• Re: [Code Review]: Resource leak in SIP/TCP
  rmudgett - 02/09/12 02:47 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Resource leak in SIP/TCP
  rmudgett - 02/13/12 12:37 PM
• Re: [Code Review] Resource leak in SIP/TCP
  Mark Michelson - 02/23/12 05:35 PM

• Higher scheduling priority for voice handling
  J.A. Bezemer - 02/03/12 01:06 PM
• Re: Higher scheduling priority for voice handling
  Tilghman Lesher - 02/04/12 01:52 AM

• [Code Review] Add reload support to res_fax
  Mark Michelson - 02/03/12 10:13 AM